Problem 1:
Consider a neutron (mass m = 1.67*10-27 kg) in the laboratory
that is subjected to gravity (only the vertical motion in the z direction is of
interest here) and a hard wall at z = 0.
(a) What is the Hamiltonian that governs this system?
(b) Make an estimate for the wave length of the quantum mechanical ground state
of a gravitationally bound neutron.
(c) Compute the action S(E) = ∮dz p(z) and quantize it to find the quantized
energies.
(d) How do energies scale with the principal quantum number?
Solution:
- Concepts:
The WKB approximation
- Reasoning:
For this problem the WKB approximation requires that ∫q1q2
pdq = ∫q1q2
ħkdq= (n - ¼)h/2.
Here
q = z and k2
= (2m/ħ2)(E - U(z)).
- Details of the calculation:
(a) H = T + U = p2/(2m) + U(z) = -(ħ2/(2m))∂2/∂z2
+ U(z).
U(z) = mgz for z ≥ 0, U(z) = ∞ for z < 0.
(b) One way to estimate λ is to start with the deBroglie wavelength λ = h/p.
Then T = h2/(2mλ2). Assume that zmax is on the
order of λ and write E = h2/(2mλ2) + mgλ.
The ground state has the lowest energy. Differentiate with respect to λ to find
Emin.
-h2/(mλ3) + mg = 0, λ = (h2/(m2g))1/3
= h2/3/(m2/3g1/3) ~ 25 μm.
The estimate for the ground state energy then becomes Emin ~
(3/2)h2/3m1/3g2/3.
(c) The WKB approximation requires that ∫cylcepdz = ∫cylceħk(z)dz
= (n - ¼)h or ∫z1z2 p(z)dz = (n - ¼)(h/2)
if the potential has one vertical wall.
Here n = 1, 2, ..., ∫cylce denotes an integral over one complete
cycle of the classical motion, z1 and z2 are the classical
turning points, and k2 = (2m/ħ2)(E - U(z)).
For this problem ∫0zmax p(z)dz = (n - ¼)h/2, and k2 =
(2m/ħ2)(E - mgz).
We need (2m)½∫0zmax (E - mgz)½dz =
(n - ¼)πħ, with mgzmax = E, zmax = E/(mg).
Therefore (2m)½∫0E/(mg) (E - mgz)½dz
= (n - ¼)πħ.
This integral evaluate to E3/2 = (3/4)(n - ¼)hm½g/2½.
E ~ 0.655 (n - ¼)2/3 h2/3m1/3g2/3 =
0.655*(n - ¼)2/3*4.31*10-31 J.
(d) For large n, E is proportional to n2/3.
Problem 2:
Submit this problem on Canvas as Assignment 5. If you used an AI as a
Socratic tutor, submit a copy of your session leading to your solution and
reflect on your session. If you did not need any help or worked with
another student, explain your reasoning, do not just write down formulas.
A particle is moving in a one dimensional potential,
U(x) = ∞ for x < 0 and x > π,
U(x) = 0 for 0 < x < π/2,
U(x) = U0 for π/2 < x < π.
(Units: Assume all quantities are expressed in terms of consistent small
length and mass units.)

(a) The variational method can be used to find an upper bound for the
ground-state energy of the particle.
For the trial function Ψ = N(2/π)½(sin(x)
+ a sin(2x)), find the optimal value of the variational parameter a.
(b) For U0 = 0.1*ħ2/(2m), estimate the ground state
energy of the particle in terms of ħ2/(2m).
(c)
Find the wave function and energy of the ground state for the cases where U0
--> 0
and U0 --> ∞.
Solution:
- Concepts:
The variational method
- Reasoning:
To find the optimal value of the variational parameter a, we have to minimize
<ψ|H|ψ> with respect to a.
- Details of the calculation:
(a) Normalize the trial wave function:
Ψ = N(Ψ1 + aΨ2), where Ψ1 and Ψ2 are
normalized eigenfunctions of the infinite well with width π.
En = n2π2ħ2/(2mπ2) = n2ħ2/(2m)
N2(1 + a2)
= 1, N = (1/(1 + a2))½.
<H> = <ψ|H|ψ> = -(ħ2/(2m))∫0πψ*(∂2/∂x2)ψ
dx + U0∫π /2π ψ*ψ dx.
<H> = N2E0 + N24a2E0.
+ U0[N2∫π/2πψ1*ψ1dx + N2a2∫π/2πψ2*ψ2
dx + 2N2a(2/π)∫π/2πsin(x) sin(2x) dx].
Here E0 = ħ2/(2m).
<H> = E0(1 + 4a2)/(1 + a2) + U0*[0.5(1
+ a2)/(1 + a2) - (8/(3π))a/(1 + a2)]
= [U0/(1 + a2)](x + ya + za2), with x = E0/U0
+ 1/2, y = -8/(3π), z = 4E0/U0 + 1/2.
d<H>/da = 0.
[-2a/(1 + a2)][x + ya + za2)] + (y + 2za) = 0.
[-2ax - 2a2y - 2za3)] + (y + 2za) + (a2y + 2za3)=
0.
[-2ax - a2y)] + (y + 2za) = 0.
a2 + 2(x/y - z/y) a - 1 = 0.
a = -(x/y - z/y) - [(x/y - z/y)2 + 1]1/2.
a = -1.125 π E0/U0 + ((1.125 π E0/U0)2
+ 1)½.
(b) For U0 = 0.1*E0 we have a = -11.25 π + ((11.25 π)2
+ 1)½ = +0.01414,
<H>min = E0*1.0494.
Note: The suggested form of Ψ is only an acceptable wave function as long
as
<H>min > U0. For
<H>min < U0 the wave function needs to exponentially
decay in the region π/2 < x < π.
(c) As U0 --> 0 the variational parameter a approaches 0 and
N --> 1.
The ground state wave function and energy will be that of the infinite
well of width π.
Ψ = (2/π)½sin(x), E = ħ2/(2m).
As U0 --> ∞ the variational parameter approaches 1 and
N --> 1/√2.
But
Ψ = (1/π)½(sin(x) + sin(2x)), 0 < x
< π, Ψ = 0 elsewhere is not an acceptable trial wave function for
the ground state, and the variational method will not yield
an approximate ground state energy.
The ground state wave function and energy as U0 --> ∞ will be
that of the infinite well of width π/2.
Ψ = (4/π)½sin(2x), 0 < x
< π/2, Ψ = 0 elsewhere. E = 2ħ2/m.
Problem 3:
A particle of mass m is bound in a 3D radially
symmetric potential well which is weakly anharmonic, U(r) = ½mω2r2 + εr4.
(a) The ground state energy can be written as a power series
E0 = (3/2)ħω + O(ε) + O(ε2) + ... . Use first order perturbation theory
to determine the O(ε) term exactly.
(b) The first order correction to the ground state wave function will mix the
unperturbed Φ00(r) with a limited set
of Φ0n(r) of unperturbed basis states. Which basis states are mixed at
O(ε) in the ground state corrected to first order?
Specify
these using the Cartesian (nx,ny,nz) labels for the harmonic oscillator.
[Note: H0 = H0x + H0y + H0z.
H0x = ħω (a†a + ½), a = αx + iβp, a† = αx - iβp,
α = √(mω/(2ħ)), β = 1/√(2mωħ).
For eigenstates |n> of H0x we have a†|n> = (n + 1)½|n
+ 1>, a|n> = n½|n - 1>.]
Solution:
- Concepts:
First order
perturbation theory for non-degenerate states
- Reasoning:
The ground state of the 3D
isotropic harmonic oscillator is not degenerate.
- Details of the calculation:
(a) H0 = p2/(2m) + ½mω2(x2 +
y2 + z2).
U = ε(x4 + y4 + z4 + 2x2y2
+ 2x2z2 + 2y2z2).
ΔE = <0x,0y,0z|U|0x,0y,0z>
= first order energy correction to O(ε).
<0x,0y,0z|x4|0x,0y,0z>
= <0x|x4|0x> = <0|x4|0>.
<0x,0y,0z|x2y2|0x,0y,0z>
=
<0x|x2|0x><0y|y2|0y>
=
<0|x2|0><0|y2|0>.
Therefore, from symmetry,
ΔE = 3ε<0|x4|0> + 6ε<0|x2|0>2.
x = (a + a†)/(2α).
<0|x2|0> = <0|(a + a†)2|0>/(2α)2.
<0|x4|0> = <0|(a + a†)4|0>/(2α)4.
x2 = (aa + a†a† + a†a + aa†)/(4α2).
<0|x2|0> = <0|aa + aa† + a†a + a†a†|0>(2α)2
= <0|aa†|0>(2α)2 = 1/(2α)2.
<n|(a + a† )4|n> has 16 terms, but only those with
equal numbers of a and a† will be non-zero. Only six terms
survive.
<n|(a + a†)4|n> = <n|(aaa†a†
+ aa†aa†
+ aa†a†a +a†aaa† + a†aa†a
+ a†a†aa)|n>.
<n|(a + a† )4|n> = (n + 1)(n + 2) + (n + 1)2
+ 2n(n + 1) + n2 + n(n - 1).
<0|x4|0> =
3/(2α)4.
ΔE = 3ε<0|x4|0>/(2α)4 +
6ε<0|x2|0>2(2α)4 = 15ε/(2α)4 =
15εħ2/(4m2ω2).
We can also evaluate ΔE using the ground state wave function for 3D radially
symmetric harmonic oscillator potential.
The normalized ground state wave
function of the 1-dimensional harmonic oscillator is
Φ0(x)
= (mω/(πħ))¼exp(-½mωx2/ħ).
The ground state wave function for the 3D therefore is
Φ0(r)
= (mω/(πħ))3/4exp(-½mωr2/ħ).
ΔE = ε(mω/(πħ))3/4 4π ∫r6dr
exp(-mωr2/ħ). ∫x2ndx exp(-ax2)
= [1/(2n+1an)][1*3*5*...*(2n-1)](π/a)1/2.
ΔE =15εħ2/(4m2ω2).
(b) The first correction to a
non-degenerate eigenvector |0,0,0> is
|ψ01> = ∑nx,ny,nz≠0 bnx,ny,nz|Φnx,ny,nz>
.
bnx,ny,nz = <nx,ny,nz|U|0x,0y,0z>/(E0
- Enx,ny,nz).
<0|x2|nx,ny,nz> = 0 unless nx
= 0 or 2, and ny = nz = 0.
<0|x4|nx,ny,nz> = 0 unless nx
= 0, 2 or 4 and ny = nz = 0.
Basis states are mixed at O(ε) in the ground state corrected to first
order therefore are the ones shown in the table below.
| nx |
ny |
nz |
_ |
_ |
_ |
nx |
ny |
nz |
| 0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
2 |
2 |
0 |
| 2 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
2 |
0 |
2 |
| 0 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
2 |
2 |
| 0 |
0 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
4 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
0 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Aside: Different eigenbasis for H0 exist, for example
{|n, l, m>}, with eigenvalues Enl = (3/2 + 2(n - 1) + l)ħω,
n = 1, 2, ... , l = 0, 1, 2, ... .
Using this basis, states that are mixed at O(ε) in the ground state
corrected to first order are
|n, l, m> = |1, 0, 0>, |2, 0, 0>, and |3,
0, 0>.
These are states with the same energy eigenvalues and l = 0.]
Problem 4:
Consider a 3-state quantum mechanical system with the Hamiltonian
Estimate the eigenvalues of this Hamiltonian using perturbation theory. Do
you have to use degenerate or non-degenerate perturbation theory?
Solution: