Problem 1:An electron is moving freely in the x-direction.
At t = 0
the electron is described by the wave function (neglect spin)
Ψ(x,0) = Aexp{-x2/2b2}exp{ip0x/ħ}.
(a) Compute the constant A such that ∫-∞+∞|ψ(x,0)|2 dx
= 1.
(b) Compute ∆x at t = 0.
(c) Compute ∆p at t = 0
and show that for this electron ∆x∆p = ħ/2.
(d) Assume that the electron has a position uncertainty of ∆x = 10-10
m.
Compute its velocity uncertainty
compared to the speed of light.
(me = 9.1*10-31 kg,
ħ = 1.05*10-34 J s, c = 3*108 m/s).
Hint: ∫-∞+∞dx
exp(-(ax2 + bx + c)) = (π/a)1/2 exp((b2 -
4ac)/(4a)).
To obtain, for example, ∫-∞+∞dx
x exp(-ax2), differentiate
with respect to b and then set b = c = 0.
Solution:
- Concepts::
The mean value and the root mean square deviation of an
observable
- Reasoning:
The expression for the mean value of an observable A in the normalized state
|Ψ> is <A> = <Ψ|A|Ψ>. If |Ψ> is not normalized then <A> = <Ψ|A|Ψ>/<Ψ|Ψ>.
The root mean square deviation ΔA characterizes the dispersion of the
measurement around <A>.
ΔA = (<(A - <A>)2>)1/2 = (<A2> - <A>2)1/2.
- Details of the calculation:
(a) ∫-∞+∞dx|Ψ(x)|2
= |A|2 ∫-∞+∞dx exp{-x2/b2} = |A|2bπ1/2.
|A|2
= 1/(bπ1/2).
(b) Δx = (<x2> - <x>2)1/2. <x>
= 0 from symmetry.
<x2> = ∫-∞+∞x2|Ψ(x)|2dx
=
|A|2∫-∞+∞x2exp{-x2/b2} dx = b2/π1/2∫-∞+∞x'2exp{-x'2} dx' = b2/2.
Δx = b/21/2.
(c) Δp = (<p2> - <p>2)1/2.
pΨ(x) = (ħ/i)(∂/∂x)Ψ(x) = (p0 + iħx/b2)Ψ(x).
p2Ψ(x)
= [(p0 + iħx/b2)2
+ ħ2/b2]Ψ(x).
<p> = ∫-∞+∞
dx(p0 + iħx/b2)|Ψ(x)|2
= p0.
<p2> = ∫-∞+∞
dx[(p0 + iħx/b2)2
+ ħ2/b2]|Ψ(x)|2
= p02
+ ħ2/b2
- ħ2/b4<x2> = p02
+ ħ2/b2 - ħ2/(2b2) = p02
+ ħ2/(2b2).
Δp = ħ/(21/2b), Δx Δp
= (b/21/2) ħ/(21/2b) = ħ/2.
(d) Δv/c = Δp/(mec)
= ħ/(2mecΔx) = 1.05*10-34/[2*9.1*10-31*3*108*10-10]
= 1.9*10-3.
Problem 2:
The wave function of a particle at t = 0 is
Ψ(x) = 1/L1/2, |x| < L/2,
Ψ(x) = 0 otherwise.
At t = 0, what possible values of the momentum of the particle can be found,
and with what probability?
Solution:
- Concepts:
The postulates of quantum mechanics
- Reasoning:
P is a Hermitian operator. The possible results of a measurement are the eigenvalues of the P, -∞ < p < ∞.
When a physical quantity described by the operator P is measured on
a system in a normalized state |Ψ>,
the probability of measuring the eigenvalue p is given by dP(p)
= |<p|Ψ>|2dp
=
|Ψ(p)|2dp, where |p>
is the eigenvector corresponding to the eigenvalue p;
we assume p is a non-degenerate continuous eigenvalue of P.
- Details of the calculation:
Ψ(p) = (2πħ)-1/2∫Ψ(x,0) exp(-ipx/ħ)dx,
Ψ(p) = (2πħL)-1/2∫-L/2+L/2 exp(-ipx/ħ)dx
= (2πħL)-1/2(iħ/p)
[exp(-ipL/(2ħ)) - exp(-pL/(2ħ))]
= (2πħL)-1/2(2ħ/p)
sin(pL/(2ħ)).
The probability of
finding the particle with momentum between p and p + dp is
|Ψ(p)|2dp.
|Ψ(p)|2 = (2ħ/(πLp2)
)sin2(pL/(2ħ)).
Problem 3:A particle of mass m is confined to an infinite one-dimensional potential well of width L, i.e.
U(x) = 0, 0 < x < L, U(x)
= ∞ everywhere else.
At t = 0 the particle is equally likely
to be found in the ground state or the firsts excited state.
(a) What is the expectation value of the energy of the system?
(b) Write down a properly normalized wave
function to describe the
system at subsequent times.
(c) Find <px> for times t > 0.
Solution:
- Concepts:
Postulates of quantum mechanics, the infinite square well.
- Reasoning:
The particle is in a linear superposition of two eigenstates of the
infinite square well. The mean value of any observable A is given
by <ψ|A|ψ>.
- Details of the calculation:
The eigenfunctions of the infinite well are
ψn(x) = (2/L)1/2sin(nπx/L),
En = n2π2ħ2/(2mL2).
(a) <H> = ½(E1 + E2) =
(5/2)π2ħ2/(2mL2).
(b) ψ(x,t) = (1/L)1/2[sin(πx/L) exp(-iE1t/ħ)
+ sin(2πx/L) exp(-iE2t/ħ)]
E1 = π2ħ2/(2mL2), E2
= 4π2ħ2/(2ma2).
We can multiply the whole expression by eiΧ
, where Χ is an arbitrary phase factor,
and multiply one of the terms in the superposition by eiφ
, where φ is an arbitrary phase factor.
(c) <px> = ∫0L dx Ψ*(x)
(ħ/i)(∂/∂x) Ψ*(x)
<px> = (ħ/(iL))∫0L dx
[sin(πx/L) exp(iE1t/ħ)
+ sin(2πx/L) exp(iE2t/ħ)]
* (∂/∂x) [sin(πx/L)
exp(-iE1t/ħ) +
sin(2πx/L) exp(-iE2t/ħ)]
= (-iħπ/L2)[∫0L
dx [sin(2πx/L) cos(πx/L)
exp(i(E2 - E1)t/ħ)
+ 2∫0L dx
[sin(πx/L) cos(2πx/L) exp(-i(E2 - E1)t/ħ)]
= (-iħ/L) exp(i(E2 - E1)t/ħ) ∫0πdx
cos(x) sin(2x)
+ (2iħ/L) exp(-i(E2 - E1)t/ħ) ∫0πdx
cos(2x) sin(x)
= (-iħ/L) exp(i(E2 - E1)t/ħ)(4/3) + (2iħ/L) exp(-i(E2
- E1)t/ħ)(-2/3)
= (-4iħ/(3L))[exp(i(E2 - E1)t/ħ) - exp(i(E2
- E1)t/ħ)] = (8ħ/(3L)sin((E2 - E1)t/ħ).
Problem 4:
Consider a quantum system for which the exact
Hamiltonian is H. Assume the quantum system is of bounded spatial
extend, so that it is known rigorously that the eigenstates of H, {|Ψn>},
are complete.
(a) Show that if |Ψn>
and |Ψm> are two eigenstates of H with eigenvalues En and Em
with En ≠ Em, then <Ψn|Ψm> = 0.
(b) Suppose En = Em,
with n ≠ m. Can we still have <Ψn|Ψm> = 0
?
(c) The problem H|Ψ> = E|Ψ>
is very complicated but it is suggested that we use a trial function |Ψtrial>
for |Ψ> and approximate E by E = <Ψtrial|H|Ψtrial>/<Ψtrial|Ψtrial>.
Show that E > E0, where E0 is the lowest
eigenvalue of H.
Solution:
- Concepts::
Hermitian operators
- Reasoning:
H is a Hermitian operator.
The eigenvalues of a Hermitian operator are real. Every Hermitian
operator has at least one basis of orthonormal eigenvectors.
- Details of the calculation:
(a) H = H†,
H is a Hermitian operator
<Ψn|H|Ψm>
= Em<Ψn|Ψm>
= <Ψn|H†|Ψm>
= En<Ψn|Ψm>.
Em<Ψn|Ψm>
- En<Ψn|Ψm>
= 0. Since En ≠ Em, <Ψn|Ψm>
must be zero.
(b) Yes, an orthonormal basis for the state space can be formed by the
eigenfunctions of any Hermitian operator.
(c) Any wavefunction can be expanded in terms of the
eigenfunctions of H.
|Ψtrial> =
∑nan|Ψn>,
{|Ψn>} = orthonormal basis for the state
space.
H|Ψtrial> = ∑nanEn|Ψn>.
<Ψtrial|H|Ψtrial>
= ∑nanEn<Ψtrial|Ψn>
= ∑m∑nam*anEn<Ψm|Ψn>
= ∑m∑nam*anEnδmn<Ψn|Ψn>
= ∑n|an|2En<Ψn|Ψn> ≥ ∑n|an|2E0<Ψn|Ψn>
since E0 is the lowest eigenvalue.
<Ψtrial|H|Ψtrial>
≥ E0
∑n|an|2<Ψn|Ψn>
= E0<Ψtrial|Ψtrial>
Problem 5:
Assume that the Hamiltonian H for a quantum
system is Hermitian.
(a) Show that its eigenvalues E are real.
(b) Show that the eigenvectors |E> and
|E’> corresponding to different eigenvalues E ≠ E’
are orthogonal.
(c) If the square of the angular momentum operator L2 and its z component Lz have
eigenvectors |Elm> that are simultaneous eigenvectors of H,
i.e.
H|Elm> = E|Elm>, L2|Elm> = ħ2l(l + 1)|Elm>, Lz|Elm> = ħm|Elm>,
and these eigenvectors form a complete set of states, show that [H,L2 ]= [H,Lz] = 0.
Solution:
- Concepts:
Hermitian operators, commuting observables
- Reasoning:
The Hamiltonian is a Hermitian operator. The eigenvalues of a
Hermitian operator are real. Every Hermitian operator has at least one
basis of orthonormal eigenvectors. Eigenvectors corresponding to
different eigenvalues are orthogonal
- Details of the calculation:
(a) H|E> = E|E>; |E> is an eigenvector with eigenvalue
E.
<E|H|E> = <E|HE> = E<E|E> = <HE|E> = E*<E|E>.
since H = H†
(E* - E)<E|E> = 0, <E|E> ≠ 0
--> E = E*.
(b) H|E'> = E'|E'>; |E'> is an eigenvector with
eigenvalue E'.
<E'|H|E> = <E'|HE> = E'<E'|E> =<HE'|E> = E'<E'|E>.
(E' - E)<E'|E> = 0, E' ≠ E -->
<E'|E> = 0.
(c) [H,L2] = HL2 - L2H.
HL2|Elm> = ħ2l(l + 1)H|Elm>
= ħ2l(l + 1)E|Elm>.
L2H|Elm> = EL2|Elm> = Eħ2l(l+1)|Elm>.
[H,L2]|Elm> = 0.
Consider an arbitrary vector |Ψ>.
|Ψ>
= ∑clmn|Elm> since {|Elm>} is a
basis for the state space.
[H,L2]|Ψ> = ∑clmn[H,L2]|Elm>
= 0 for any |Ψ>.
Therefore [H,L2] = 0.
Similarly:
HLz|Elm> = mħH|Elm>
= mħE|Elm>.
LzH|Elm> = ELz|Elm> = Emħ|Elm>.
[H,Lz]|Elm> = 0.
[H,Lz]Ψ> = ∑clmn[H,Lz]|Elm>
= 0 for any |Ψ>.
Therefore [H,Lz] = 0.